However, you could also say that the documentary is not so biased as the bartender did mention the cause, the cause of most of the issues they face. He mentioned that people, mostly men, visit clubs and pubs in order to get rid of emotions and forget about most of the problems they are facing. This can be classified as a fact as he mentioned it was a personal experience and delivered this 'fact' collectively but can be opinionated too as it might not always be the case. Audiences perspective changes of people who attend clubs and pubs (contrast between the start of the documentary and the end) although we didn't get to hear the side of people who actually go clubs which means the documentary is still subjective.
In addition, the representation of both sides worked very well. The financially dominant women clothing were very explicit and showy yet good and healthy, creating a sort of stereotype on the type of women who are financially dominant. The men had Eastern European accents and one of the men shown was dressed really badly (washed-out clothes) which implies and make viewers think that the men were once rich and once their cash is drained they start to look really bad and face financial problems. This is a key fact and a sort of conclusion to the documentary.